“Paul and his team (especially Tina Shah) are incredibly efficient, smart, patient, trustworthy, and capable.”
Gurudarshan Khalsa
Google review • Excerpt
Read Google reviews ↗

November 5, 2026 · Mortgage education with a November 4 policy update
By Paul Singh, Senior Mortgage Advisor · Individual NMLS #406332
Fannie Mae announced changes on November 4 that affect specified property and underwriting policies. Some provisions are available immediately; the revised manual-underwriting matrix has a future delivery-based effective date. First-time buyers should ask which provision applies to their actual loan before relying on a headline.
Today’s lesson addresses a specific misconception: “I have a preapproval, so my financing is final.” It also explains how to read a newly announced mortgage policy without assuming it already applies to your loan.
Fannie Mae’s November 4 Lender Letter LL-2026-09 revises eligibility for manually underwritten loans delivered to Fannie Mae on or after February 22, 2027. It addresses credit-score and reserve requirements and consolidates manual-underwriting requirements, including HomeReady and HomeStyle Renovation, into one matrix. The date is tied to delivery to Fannie Mae; it is not simply a borrower’s application or closing date.
A separate November 4 announcement, SEL-2026-10, allows lenders to use expanded eligibility for ADUs in eligible condo projects immediately. It also clarifies occupancy and Community Seconds requirements and addresses credit-score policy. These are distinct provisions; do not apply one provision’s timing to every change in the announcement.
Practical meaning: A new policy may justify asking whether an option deserves review. It does not establish that your lender offers it, that your property meets the requirements or that your financing is approved. This update is Fannie Mae-specific; it does not automatically change FHA, VA, USDA or every other loan program.
The CFPB describes a preapproval as a lender’s tentative willingness to lend, subject to further confirmation. It also notes that lenders use “prequalification” and “preapproval” differently. The name alone does not tell you the depth of review.
Ask for a plain-English explanation of the remaining conditions. Put the answers beside your letter so your home search is based on its actual scope. An unresolved question should have an owner and a next action, rather than disappearing behind an encouraging headline.
What information has actually been verified? Ask which conclusions rely on records already reviewed and which still depend on information you supplied.
What conditions remain for this buyer and this property? Once you identify a home, ask whether its type or features introduce additional review.
Does the letter still match the proposed transaction? Confirm that the intended occupancy, financing structure and relevant assumptions have not changed.
What date or change would require an update? Read the letter’s expiration terms and ask how to report changes in your finances or purchase plans.
Which rule and effective-date test apply to this loan? If a policy announcement is part of the discussion, request the specific provision and ask the lender to confirm its application.
A first-time buyer receives a preapproval while considering a straightforward home purchase. Later, the buyer finds a condo with an accessory dwelling unit and reads about Fannie Mae’s November 4 announcement.
The useful next action is to send the property information to the mortgage advisor and ask whether the lender can evaluate that exact scenario under the applicable guidance. The buyer should not treat the announcement as confirmation that this condo project, unit or proposed financing qualifies.
This is an educational example, not a borrower case or an eligibility determination. A promising option and a completed approval are different stages of a decision.
Do: Keep a short decision note with the proposed property, the open financing question and the person responsible for confirming it. Coordinate offer deadlines with your Realtor and mortgage advisor while review is still pending.
Avoid: Treating a policy headline, letter label or verbal reassurance as proof that all financing conditions are satisfied. Ask for clarification before making commitments based on an assumption.
Use the mortgage worksheets to capture the questions that remain. If your records are still scattered, follow the first-home mortgage getting-started checklist.
Want help understanding your starting point or a condition in your letter? Book a 15-minute conversation with Paul Singh. Bring the actual letter and the question you need answered.
CFPB: Get a preapproval letter — last modified December 12, 2024.
CFPB: Prequalification and preapproval letters — last reviewed December 5, 2023; modified December 12, 2023.
Fannie Mae: LL-2026-09, Manual Underwriting Eligibility — issued November 4, 2026; delivery-based effective date February 22, 2027.
Fannie Mae: SEL-2026-10, Selling Guide Updates — issued November 4, 2026; immediate availability identified above applies to the specified provisions.
Paul Singh, Senior Mortgage Advisor
Individual NMLS #406332 · Petra Cephas Inc., Company NMLS #1222300
856-503-9396 · [email protected]
Petra Cephas Inc. is a mortgage broker arranging loans through third-party lenders. Educational information only; not a commitment to lend or a guarantee of approval, rates or terms. Approval and availability depend on underwriting, documentation, property, applicable state requirements and lender guidelines. Primary- and second-home discussions focus on NJ, NY, PA, CT, TX and FL; availability must be verified for the applicable state and program. DSCR availability depends on applicable state and lender requirements. Equal Housing Opportunity.
In their own words
Selected five-star review excerpts about working with Paul. Explore the full histories on the original review platforms.
“Paul and his team (especially Tina Shah) are incredibly efficient, smart, patient, trustworthy, and capable.”
Gurudarshan Khalsa
Google review • Excerpt
Read Google reviews ↗
“Paul has been very helpful and he answered all our questions.”
Shanti Narvekar
Zillow • March 2017 • Excerpt
Review from Paul’s time at a previous firm.
Read Zillow reviews ↗
“Paul treated me like his own family member”
Bhupendra S
Experience.com profile • January 2025 • Excerpt
Read the review profile ↗
Ratings and counts checked October 14, 2026; they may change. Experience.com’s combined profile includes reviews imported from other platforms, so counts overlap and should not be added together. These are selected positive excerpts, not every review. Historical experiences do not guarantee approval, rates, terms or future results. Read each platform for the complete context.